reading
i've had the kindle for a little over two weeks now, and i gotta say that i really like it --- i'm reading a lot more of the times and the constitution, the latter of which i rarely read at all --- it is so much easier to skim the headlines, even if you don't get every single thing (ads!) that you get in the dead-tree version ---however, the kindle may have made my reading even more indiscriminate than it's always been --- e.g., normally i would not be inclined to think about reading sherman's memoirs of the civil war, since military history is not my thing, but there it was for 99 cents or something, so i downloaded it right after i did charles dickens and thomas hardy, the complete works of whom i acquired digitally for 2.99 each --- sherman's memoirs turn out to be quite interesting, and he himself comes through as an extremely intelligent, well-educated, and civilized soul, that somehow the scraggly-ass photographs of him during the civil war don't quite convey --- he was in california in the late 1840s, just as the gold rush was getting underway, and his account of that is the best of the whole thing ---anyway, if you are a total pervert about reading the way i am, you probably need one --- no more lugging a book around and having to have both hands free to use it --- i can walk the dog and read now, should i choose to take my multi-tasking to that level --- amazon really need to work on their formatting and proofing, but i can trade some crappy formatting and some typos for the convenience
4 comments:
Actually, Amazon isn't responsible for the formatting: they're at the mercy of the publishers' conversion process. Some are not very good. I've done some ePub conversions for Kindle, and it's more challenging than you'd think ;-)
But you're right: I'm certainly reading more than ever.
you'd think the publishers would have a little more pride in their work ---
If the publisher has a digital file created in a page layout or text composition program such as LaTEX, that can be more easily repurposed as Kindle fodder. If they only have ancient hard copy (printed or photostatic sources), they have to scan and run OCR on them (optical character recognition). That's not the most flexible source, and it's painful to attempt to repurpose as a Kindle .mobi file.
Everyone thinks it's "oh, you just press a button on the computer." Wish it were that easy. And it gets much harder if there are illustrations.
Just so you know...
i knew it wasn't simple
Post a Comment